Research Compliance

Beyond the principle-practice gap: Responsible AI as situated epistemic and ethical practice

Nov 4, 2026 Source ↗

Key Insights

Responsible AI scholarship has found that ethical principles are frequently not reflected in AI design and development.
Conceptualised as a `gap' between principle and practice, this is framed as a pr.

Design

Cite this synthesis DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2611.06709 ↗

Show formatted citation

@misc{ acaciacompliance-research-beyond-the-principle-practice-gap-responsible-ai-as-situated,
  title = { Beyond the principle-practice gap: Responsible AI as situated epistemic and ethical practice },
  author = { Leszek },
  year = { 2026 },
  doi = { 10.48550/arXiv.2611.06709 },
  url = { http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06709v1 },
  note = {Summarized and classified by AcaciaFund}
}

TY  - GEN
TI  - Beyond the principle-practice gap: Responsible AI as situated epistemic and ethical practice
AU  - Leszek
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.48550/arXiv.2611.06709
UR  - http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06709v1
ER  -

Edit on GitHub — registry.json

Overview

Responsible AI scholarship has found that ethical principles are frequently not reflected in AI design and development. Conceptualised as a `gap' between principle and practice, this is framed as a pr

Why It Matters

This item adds to the AML and compliance knowledge base. Practitioners can use it to stay current on Beyond the principle-practice gap: Responsible AI as situated epistemic and ethical practice, but should validate its claims against primary sources and more recent work before relying on it in production decisions.

Key Takeaways

Understand how Beyond the principle-practice gap: Responsible AI as situated epistemic and ethical practice relates to AML and compliance workflows and controls.
Assess evidence quality and freshness before acting on the findings.
Use the tagged topics to connect this item to related content in the library.

Article Metadata

Evergreen Synthesized

aml

Design

SQI 0.750